Intraoperative Epiphyseal Perfusion Monitoring Does Not Reliably Predict Osteonecrosis Following Treatment of Unstable SCFE.

BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis (AVN) remains the most dreaded complication of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treatment. Newer closed reduction techniques (with perfusion monitoring) have emerged as a technically straightforward means to address residual SCFE deformity while still minimizing the risk of osteonecrosis. However, limited data exists regarding the reliability of intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion monitoring to predict the development of AVN. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its reliability. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with unstable SCFE who underwent closed or open reduction with epiphyseal perfusion monitoring using an intracranial pressure (ICP) probe from 2015 to 2023 at a single institution with a minimum 6-month radiographic follow-up. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were recorded, including duration of symptoms, type of reduction, capsulotomy performed, presence of a waveform on ICP monitoring after epiphyseal fixation, and development of AVN on follow-up radiographs. RESULTS: Our cohort included 33 hips (32 patients), of which 60.6% (n=20) were male. The average age was 12.5±1.8 years, with a median follow-up of 15.8 months. Eleven hips were treated with open reduction using the modified Dunn technique (10 hips) or anterior approach (1 hip), and 22 hips were treated with inadvertent (5 hips) or purposeful closed reduction using the Leadbetter technique (17 hips). Overall, 8 of the 33 hips in our series (24.2%) developed AVN, 6 of which (20%) had a pulsatile waveform on intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion monitoring. The overall rate of AVN after closed reductions was 31.8% (7 of 22 hips); the incidence of AVN after closed reduction with a detectable waveform was 30% (6 of 20 hips). There was no significant association between time to surgery ( P =0.416) or type of reduction ( P =0.218) and the incidence of AVN. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion monitoring did not reliably predict the development of osteonecrosis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report AVN after demonstrable intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion following closed reduction of unstable slips. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: case series-therapeutic study.

Femoral Head Remodeling After Surgical Reduction of Developmental Hip Dislocations.

OBJECTIVE: Developmental dysplasia of the hip is prevalent and is associated with dysplasia of both the femoral head and acetabulum. There is a paucity of literature describing femoral head remodeling after surgical reduction of developmentally dislocated hips. The purpose of this study was to describe and quantify changes in femoral head sphericity after closed or open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with typical developmental hip dislocations who underwent closed or open reduction from 2009 to 2022 at a single institution and had immediate postoperative and average 3-week follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. A subset of patients also had 3-year follow-up MRI scans. Patients with insufficient imaging or bony procedures at the time of reduction were excluded. We developed a technique to quantify femoral head "sphericity" by comparing differences in measured radii of the femoral head on axial and coronal plane MRI slices. We then calculated the variance of the radii for each plane and averaged these to calculate a combined variance. The variance was used to represent "sphericity," with a larger variance indicating a wider distribution of radii and thus a less spherical shape. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (69 females) with 96 hips were included in this series. The median age of the child at the time of reduction was 8.7 months [interquartile range (IQR): 2.2]. Over half (58.3%) of the hips had a closed reduction, whereas the remaining were open reduced (41.7%). Immediately postoperatively, at the 3-week time point, and at the 3-year time point the median combined variance was 1.1 (IQR: 3.93), 0.51 (IQR: 1.32), and 0.31 (IQR: 0.50), respectively, indicating improved sphericity over time. CONCLUSIONS: Sphericity of the femoral head in developmental hip dislocations improves in both the immediate postoperative period, as well as the first few years after reduction. Further research is needed to evaluate the mechanism of remodeling, the ideal timing of reduction, and the relationship between femoral head and acetabular remodeling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series, therapeutic study.

Stepwise lengthening of quadriceps extensor mechanism for severe obligatory and fixed patella dislocators: Four-year clinical and surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to report clinical and surgical outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and concomitant quadriceps lengthening to treat fixed and obligatory patellofemoral instability (PFI) in the pediatric population. METHODS: Patients with obligatory or fixed PFI who underwent simultaneous MPFLR and quadriceps lengthening from 2008 to 2020 were reviewed. Of the 413 records, 24 fit the inclusion criteria. Demographic information, surgical details, associated diagnoses, and outcome measures were collected for each knee. Complications and additional surgeries were also obtained. RESULTS: The final cohort included 20 patients (10 male, 10 female), with a total of 24 knees. The average age at the time of surgery was 11.9 â€‹± â€‹3.1 (5.4-17.3). Seventeen were obligatory dislocators in flexion and 7 were fixed dislocators. Average follow-up was 4.3 â€‹± â€‹2.4 (1.3-9.4) years. One patient was lost to follow-up and excluded from the study. The mean outcome measures were as followed; KOOS 82, HSS Pedi-FABS 9, IKDC 76, Kujala 78, BPII 67, and SANE 90. Six patients had subsequent instability episodes. Ten patients had a subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Reports on quadriceps lengthening to treat PFI in the pediatric population are rare. Six (25 â€‹%) of the 24 knees included had subsequent PFI. Although this is a high rate of recurrent instability, no second surgeries were indicated for infection, extensor mechanism weakness, or contracture. The authors conclude that simultaneous MPFLR and stepwise quadriceps lengthening can be used to effectively manage fixed and obligatory PFI in this difficult patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Signficant Femoral Version Abnormalities and Patient-Reported Quality of Life.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine how the Limb Deformity-Modified Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaire scores differ between patients with femoral version abnormalities and healthy control subjects. METHODS: A retrospective database review identified patients with femoral version abnormalities between December 2018 and September 2022. A total of 21 adult patients scheduled for femoral derotational osteotomy and 33 control subjects were included. All individuals completed the LD-SRS and PROMIS questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients with femoral version abnormalities reported significantly worse scores than control subjects on all LD-SRS and PROMIS domains: LD-SRS (Total [3.46 ± 0.66 vs. 4.58 ± 0.37, P < 0.001]; Function/Activity [3.48 ± 0.83 vs. 4.44 ± 0.4, P < 0.001]; Mental Health [3.41 ± 0.96 vs. 4.3 ± 0.73, P < 0.001]; Pain [3.55 ± 0.9 vs. 4.81 ± 0.31, P < 0.001]; and Self-Image/Appearance [3.37 ± 0.79 vs. 4.75 ± 0.43, P < 0.001]) and PROMIS (Function [41.6 ± 7.58 vs. 60.0 ± 7.28, P < 0.001]; Pain Intensity [45.85 ± 8.04 vs. 33.7 ± 4.89, P < 0.001]; Pain Interference [56.78 ± 9.63 vs. 42.8 ± 6.6, P < 0.001]; Global Mental Health [47.97 ± 9.68 vs. 55.3 ± 7.81, P = 0.004]; and Global Physical Health [45.23 ± 7.49 vs. 58.2 ± 7.07, P < 0.001]). DISCUSSION: Patients with femoral version abnormalities reported markedly worse quality of life as measured on the LD-SRS and PROMIS scores compared with healthy control subjects. The combination of these two surveys effectively captures the multifaceted quality-of-life-deficit individuals with excessive femoral version may experience.

Outcomes of percutaneous femoral derotational osteotomy in pediatric patients.

Background: Percutaneous femoral derotational osteotomies are performed in both adult and pediatric patients. There is little published on the outcomes after femoral derotational osteotomy in pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients treated with percutaneous femoral derotational osteotomy by one of two surgeons between 2016 and 2022 was performed. Data collected included patient demographics; surgical indications; femoral version; tibial torsion; magnitude of rotational correction; complications; time to hardware removal; pre-operative and post-operative patient-reported outcome scores, including Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; and time to consolidation. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and t tests used to compare means. Results: Thirty-one femoral derotational osteotomies in 19 patients were included with an average age of 14.7 (9-17) years. The average rotational correction was 21.5° ± 6.4° (10°-40°). The average length of follow-up was 17.9 ± 6.7 months. There were no instances of nonunion, joint stiffness, or nerve injury. No patients returned to the operating room for additional surgeries other than routine hardware removal. There were no cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Of the 19 patients, 8 completed both a pre-operative and post-operative survey set. There were significant improvements in the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society Self-Image/Appearance sub-category and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function sub-category. Conclusion: Femoral derotational osteotomy using a percutaneous drill hole technique with antegrade trochanteric entry femoral nail is safe in the pediatric population and improves self-image in patients with symptomatic femoral version abnormalities.

Back to Basics: Pediatric Casting Techniques, Pearls, and Pitfalls.

Cast application is a critical portion of pediatric orthopaedic surgery training and is being performed by a growing number of non-orthopaedic clinicians including primary care physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs). Given the tremendous remodeling potential of pediatric fractures, correct cast placement often serves as the definitive treatment in this age population as long as alignment is maintained. Proper cast application technique is typically taught through direct supervision from more senior clinicians, with little literature and few resources available for providers to review during the learning process. Given the myriad complications that can result from cast application or removal, including pressure sores and cast saw burns, a thorough review of proper cast technique is warranted. This review and technique guide attempts to illustrate appropriate upper and lower extremity fiberglass cast application (and waterproof casts), including pearls and pitfalls of cast placement. This basic guide may serve as a resource for all orthopaedic and non-orthopaedicproviders, including residents, APPs, and medical students in training. Level of Evidence: IV.

Use of Implant-Mediated Guided Growth With Tension Band Plate in Skeletally Immature Patients With Knee Pathology: A Retrospective Review.

Background: Skeletally immature patients with coronal plane angular deformity (CPAD) may be at increased risk for intra-articular pathology and patellofemoral instability (PFI). These patients may be candidates for implant-mediated guided growth (IMGG) procedures with tension band plates to address CPAD in addition to procedures for concomitant knee pathology. However, there are limited data on performing these procedures simultaneously. Questions/Purpose: We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of combined procedures to address both knee pathology and concomitant CPAD using IMGG in skeletally immature patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of skeletally immature patients who underwent IMGG and concomitant surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, osteochondritis dissecans repair, meniscus pathology, or PFI at a single institution by 2 surgeons between 2008 and 2019. Data on demographics, surgical details, follow-up, and complications were recorded. Deformity correction was assessed in a subset of eligible patients. Results: Of 29 patients meeting inclusion criteria, deformity correction was assessed in a subset of 17 patients (15 valgus, 2 varus). At final follow-up, 16 of 17 patients had mechanical tibiofemoral (mTFA) angles of <5° of varus or valgus. One patient developed "rebound" valgus >5° after plate removal. Conclusions: The IMGG performed in the setting of treating intra-articular knee pathology is feasible and should be considered for skeletally immature patients with CPAD undergoing surgery for concomitant knee pathology.

Hip Morphology in Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) Patients Treated for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) as Infants Compared With Those Without Infant Treatment.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients successfully treated for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) as infants have symptomatic acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity leading to periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of this study was to compare femoral and acetabular morphology in PAO patients with late acetabular dysplasia after previous treatment for DDH with PAO patients who do not have a history of DDH treatment. METHODS: A single surgeon's patients who underwent PAO between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients previously treated for infantile DDH with a Pavlik harness, abduction brace, closed reduction and spica casting, or open reduction and spica casting were included. Patients with previous bony hip surgery were excluded. Preoperative radiographic measurements of each hip were recorded including lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, and Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof index. Computed tomography measurements included the coronal center edge angle, sagittal center edge angle, Tönnis angle, acetabular anteversion at 1, 2, and 3 o'clock, femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral version, and alpha angle. Control PAO cases without a history of DDH diagnosis or treatment were matched with the infantile DDH treatment group in a 2:1 ratio based on coronal center edge angle, age, and sex. RESULTS: There were 21 hips in 18 patients previously treated for infantile DDH (13 patients Pavlik harness, 3 abduction brace, 1 closed reduction, and 1 open reduction). The control PAO cohort was 42 hips in 42 patients who did not have previous DDH treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the recorded measurements between patients previously treated for DDH and those without previous treatment including femoral version (P=0.494), anteversion at 1 o'clock (P=0.820), anteversion at 2 o'clock (P=0.584), anteversion at 3 o'clock (P=0.137), neck-shaft angle (P=0.612), lateral center edge angle (P=0.433), Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof index (P=0.144), and alpha angle (P=0.156). CONCLUSIONS: Femoral and acetabular morphology is similar between PAO patients with persistent symptomatic acetabular dysplasia following DDH treatment and patients presenting after skeletal maturity with acetabular dysplasia and no previous history of DDH treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-case-control, prognostic study.

Talocalcaneal Tarsal Coalition Size: Evaluation and Reproducibility of MRI Measurements.

BACKGROUND: The size of talocalcaneal tarsal coalitions (TCCs) is one of the main factors that is thought to influence patient outcomes after resection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used to diagnose and characterize TCCs. However, there is no reproducible MRI-based measurement of TCC size reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to create a method to reproducibly measure TCC size using MRI. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with TCCs diagnosed by a hindfoot coronal proton density (PD) MRI between 2017 and 2020 were included. Five independent raters measured coalition width, healthy posterior facet width, and healthy middle facet width on individual slices of coronal PD hindfoot MRIs using discrete MRI measurement guidelines. Individual slice measurements were summed to determine total size of the coalition and the remaining healthy cartilage of the posterior and middle facets. Inter-rater reliability of MRI measurements between the 5 independent examiners was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC was calculated for total coalition width, total healthy posterior facet width, total coalition width/total healthy posterior facet width, total coalition width/total healthy middle facet width, total coalition width/total healthy subtalar facet width (posterior facet+middle facet), and total coalition width/total subtalar facet width (coalition+posterior facet+middle facet). RESULTS: The ICC scores for all but one of the MRI measurements indicated good to excellent inter-rater reliability among the 5 examiners. The ICC was 0.932 (95% confidence interval: 0.881-0.966) for measurement of total coalition width/total healthy posterior facet width and 0.948 (95% confidence interval: 0.908-0.973) for measurement of total coalition width/total subtalar facet width (middle+posterior+coalition). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of coalition size using novel MRI guidelines were reproducible with good to excellent inter-rater reliability. These guidelines allow for determination of TCC size using coronal PD MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-diagnostic reproducibility study.

Percutaneous Femoral Derotational Osteotomy in the Skeletally Immature Patient.

Percutaneous femoral derotational osteotomies are performed in both adult and pediatric patients for excessive symptomatic femoral anteversion or retroversion1,2. The aim of the procedure is to correct version abnormalities with use of a minimally invasive technique3. Description: This is a percutaneous procedure that involves creation of femoral drill holes at the osteotomy site prior to reaming the canal4. External fixator pins are placed proximal and distal to the osteotomy site prior to completing the osteotomy. These pins are derotational markers for the surgeon and act to hold the correction with use of an external fixator while the interlocking screws are being placed. The pins are placed at a degree of divergence that is equal to the degree of intended derotation so that the pins will become parallel in the axial plane following derotation of the femur. The percutaneous osteotomy is then completed with use of an osteotome, and the trochanteric entry nail is passed across the osteotomy site while correcting rotation. Once rotation is fully corrected and the pins are parallel, the external fixator is placed to hold the rotation and interlocking screws are placed. Alternatives: Nonoperative alternatives to this procedure include physical therapy for gait training and strengthening as well as modalities to address hip and knee pain that may be associated with version abnormalities. Although physical therapy is often prescribed, it must be noted that excess version is a fixed osseous structural pathology that therapy cannot address. Additionally, compensatory mechanisms that may be taught to improve gait and walk with a neutral foot progression angle may exacerbate hip or knee pathology as a result of the underlying version abnormality. Surgical alternatives include derotational osteotomies of the proximal or distal aspects of the femur with use of an open technique with plate fixation, as opposed to an intramedullary nail following percutaneous diaphyseal osteotomy as presented here1. Additionally, an open technique with intramedullary nail fixation may be performed5. Rationale: Excessive anteversion can cause both hip and knee symptoms, including hip pain, instability, labral and psoas pathology, and patellofemoral instability6. Excessive retroversion can cause impingement between the femoral neck and acetabulum, which results in pathology of the labrum and articular cartilage7. Additionally, abnormalities of version often lead to gait disturbances with frequent tripping and difficulty running8. Children with femoral version abnormalities have limited remodeling potential after age 83. A derotational osteotomy may be performed to correct symptomatic excess femoral version in an older child or adolescent. Expected Outcomes: The patient may be weight-bearing as tolerated with upper-extremity assistance immediately following the procedure. The osteotomy typically heals between 6 and 12 weeks, and the patient may return to activities as tolerated once the osteotomy is healed. Gordon et al. described the outcomes of a similar technique for femoral derotational osteotomy in skeletally immature patients with excessive femoral anteversion3. The study retrospectively reviewed the results of the technique in 13 patients and 21 limbs at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. All patients complained of tripping and gait abnormalities preoperatively. All patients noted gait improvement, and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. Healing of the osteotomy occurred at a mean of 6 weeks postoperatively. No patient developed osteonecrosis. We routinely remove hardware in skeletally immature patients approximately 1 year postoperatively. Complications are rare and include hardware irritation, infection, nonunion, and neurovascular injury. Important Tips: Preoperative planning is critical for this procedure, and the surgeon should know the intended degree of derotation, the location of the osteotomy relative to the greater trochanter, the length of the nail, and the approximate diameter of the nail prior to entering the operating room.Percutaneous bicortical femoral drill holes are created at the site of the osteotomy prior to reaming to allow for egress of reamings and bone marrow elements at the osteotomy site, which serve as autograft and stimulate bone healing. Additionally, the drill holes provide ventilation to prevent excessive intramedullary pressure during reaming9-11.External fixator pins are placed proximal and distal to the osteotomy prior to completion of the osteotomy to allow for rotational assessment after completion of the osteotomy. Placing these pins bicortically so that they are secure in the bone and ensuring that the divergence is correct for the intended amount of derotation is critical in this procedure because once the osteotomy is complete, the pins are the only markers of rotation the surgeon has to guide the correction.An external fixator is helpful in holding the femur at the intended degree of derotation during placement of the interlocking screws. Acronyms & Abbreviations: ROM = range of motionCT = computed tomographyMRI = magnetic resonance imagingAP = anteroposteriorGT = greater trochanterAV = anteversionER = external rotationIR = internal rotationA = anteriorP = posteriorM = medialL = lateralXR = X-rayProx = proximalEx fix = external fixatorWBAT = weight-bearing as toleratedBLE = bilateral lower extremitiesDVT = deep venous thrombosisPT = physical therapyppx = prophylaxisAVN = avascular necrosis (osteonecrosis).

Analysis of the Basic Science Questions on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination From 2014 to 2019.

INTRODUCTION: The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE), produced by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), plays an important role in the educational mission of orthopaedic residency programs nationwide. An up-to-date understanding of this examination is critical for programs to develop an appropriate curriculum and for individuals to identify learning resources. This study presents an updated analysis of the basic science section of the OITE from 2014 to 2019. METHODS: All questions from the OITE from 2014 to 2019 were reviewed. Each question from the basic science section was categorized by topic and taxonomy. The use of radiographic images or other clinical media was recorded. The reference section was analyzed for bibliometric factors. Pearson chi-square tests were used as appropriate for statistical comparison. RESULTS: In total, 185 of 1,600 questions in the basic science section were used over the 6-year study period (11.6%). The proportion of basic science questions ranged from 10.7% to 12.0% from year to year. The most frequently tested topics were cellular and molecular biology (23.8%), physiology/pathophysiology (16.8%), and pharmacology (10.8%). There was an increase in the number of biostatistics questions from 2017 to 2019 compared with the number from 2014 to 2016 (P = 0.02). The most common taxonomic category was knowledge recall (89.7%). A total of 383 references were cited from 122 sources. The 3 most common sources accounting for 44.4% of all citations were produced by the AAOS. DISCUSSION: The basic science section of the OITE accounts for approximately 11% of all questions, with the most common taxonomy being knowledge recall (89.7%). Recent tests have emphasized biostatistics, highlighting the importance of incorporating biostatistics into residency education. Reference materials produced by the AAOS were highly cited in this section.

Analysis of Hip and Knee Reconstruction Questions on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination.

BACKGROUND: It is vital for orthopedic residents and residency programs to have a current understanding of the materials and resources utilized on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) to tailor resident educational curricula accordingly. This study presents an updated analysis of the hip and knee section of the OITE. METHODS: All OITE questions related to hip and knee reconstruction over six examinations between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed for topic, subtopic, taxonomy, imaging modalities, resident performance, and references. RESULTS: There were 166 hip and knee reconstruction questions of 1600 OITE questions (10.4%) over a six-year period. The most commonly tested topics include mechanical properties of total knee and hip implants (10.8%), instability after THA (10.8%), periprosthetic fracture (10.2%), and prosthetic joint infection (10.2%). A total of 362 references were cited from 68 different sources. The most common sources were JOA, JBJS, JAAOS, and CORR, which were collectively responsible for 68% of all citations. There was an average publication lag of 7.1 years, with 75% of all citations falling within 10 years of the question date. Compared with a prior analysis from 2005 and 2009, there were significantly more complex multistep questions regarding treatment and fewer one-step knowledge recall questions (P = .003). Similarly, recent tests had significantly more questions involving interpretation of radiographs (55%, P < .001) and advanced imaging (9.6%, P < .001), compared with a decade ago. CONCLUSIONS: The OITE continues to evolve over time, incorporating recent literature and topics. The current analysis identifies high-yield topics and resources that can guide resident preparation for the OITE hip and knee section.

Adolescent hip dysplasia: what are the symptoms and how to diagnose it.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Adolescent and young adult hip dysplasia is a cause of hip pain which can lead to early hip osteoarthritis. This may result in early hip osteoarthrosis and possible total hip arthroplasty if dysplasia is not recognized and treated. Hip dysplasia in this population can be difficult to diagnose. It is important for primary care providers and pediatricians to recognize the symptoms, physical examination findings, and radiographic findings associated with adolescent hip dysplasia so that the patient can be referred to an orthopedist specializing in hip disorder. The current review includes the most up-to-date literature on the diagnosis of adolescent hip dysplasia. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have shown that most patients presenting with symptomatic hip dysplasia present with insidious onset hip pain localized to either the groin or lateral aspect of the hip in a C-shape distribution around the inguinal crease. Patients most commonly see several different providers and have pain for a long period prior to accurate diagnosis. There are myriad radiographic measurements of hip dysplasia, many of which are described below that are helpful in initial diagnosis. SUMMARY: Adolescent and young adult hip dysplasia can be a cause of early, progressive hip osteoarthritis. Hip dysplasia is a term that represents a spectrum of disorder due to abnormal formation of the hip joint, resulting in an acetabulum that does not sufficiently cover the femoral head. The ability to recognize symptoms, physical examination findings, and radiographic evidence of adolescent hip dysplasia is critical so that the patient can be referred to the appropriate provider and receive timely treatment prior to the onset of degenerative hip disease. This article will focus mainly on the diagnosis of adolescent hip dysplasia. The standard for treatment of acetabular dysplasia in skeletally mature patients is the periacetabular osteotomy; however, nonoperative management and occasionally arthroscopic surgery can also be considered in cases of symptomatic borderline dysplasia.

An Updated Analysis of the Pediatric Section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination.

BACKGROUND: An updated analysis of the pediatrics section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) is helpful for resident education and preparation for the OITE. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated evaluation of the pediatric category of the OITE, and to explore trends in question topics and taxonomy compared with the previously published analysis from 2011 to 2014. METHODS: Five years (2015-2019) of OITE questions, answers, and references were reviewed. The number of pediatric questions per year was recorded, and questions were subcategorized based on topic tested. The presence or absence of imaging or a clinical photograph was noted. Each question was also assigned a cognitive taxonomy level, based on a previously published classification system. RESULTS: The percentage of pediatric questions on the 2015-2019 OITEs averaged 11.4% compared with 12.6% from 2011 to 2014 (P=0.349). The 3 most commonly tested pediatric topics were general trauma (17.8%), elbow trauma (13.2%), and genetic disorders/syndromes (11.2%). There was a significant increase in questions that required diagnosis and interpretation (27.6% vs. 8%, P<0.001) and a slight but not significant decrease in the questions requiring simple knowledge recall (26.3% vs. 35.5%, P=0.120) and decisions about management (46.1% vs. 56.5%, P=0.077). Overall, 65% of questions utilized clinical photographs or imaging studies compared with 62% from 2011 to 2014 (P=0.621). The most common references were the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Textbooks were cited less frequently than in the past. CONCLUSIONS: While the percentage of pediatric questions on the OITE has remained consistent over time, the percentage of questions requiring diagnosis and interpretation has increased. In addition, questions testing genetic disorders/syndromes have become more prevalent in recent years. The most commonly cited resources were high-impact journal articles, with textbooks cited less frequently than in previous years. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the most frequently tested topics and resources cited may assist orthopaedic residents in preparing for the OITE and orthopaedic faculty to focus didactic sessions on the most commonly tested topics.